Group Influence: Surface Navy Association Essay

For this paper I decided to sit with a multitude that I know, that I submit to stay away from because I did not requisite to be part of that mold According to Myers, an conference is two or more(prenominal) wad who move with and influence each new(prenominal) (Myers, 2010). However, the scopes of a throng spread further. Behaviors within the convention be active the other and, events within the group affect all members, and behaviors affect the success of the group. I picked the rise up naval forces knowledge because the group dynamics within the arranging displayed unity, and I in like manner saw people seting to what they mat was the norm. This type of group shows a heavy peak of social influence. Which occurs when an we interact with other people or group. The impacts of this interaction may be compulsive or ban on the individual.Hawaii branch of the SNA is set(p) in Honolulu, Hawaii. This organization is comprised of the local soldiers members enlisted and officer. The organization is comprised of approximately 1500 members made up of retired and active array US navy and other braches of the military that conceal and relate in the Surface Military. SNA was incorporated in 1985 to promote greater coordination and communication among those in the military, clientele and academic communities who sh ar a common interest in Naval Surface Warf ar and to keep up the activities of Surface Naval Forces (Surface Navy connection, 2014). Meetings for the tie-in are held on the first Wednesday of the month at the blackjack Koa hotel. They hold their impacts in a conference room, but the setting is very laid back and open. position for members is not fixed he or she is bounteous to sit in all available seat. SNA is very diverse in the ages of members, which range from 21 to 70 years of age. Members are primarily male a small percentage is female, and ethnicity ofthis group range from Caucasian, Asian, Hawaiian, Afri burn American and m whatsoever others. However, there is a pecking order within this association. There are officers, which consist of an president, wrong president, secretary, treasurer. The highest att determinationing officer usually the president or vice president facilitates the meeting. The meeting starts off with a conversation of anything that is happening that will affect the military then moves to a pre-set agenda. The agenda consists of the minutes of the put out meeting being read, the presidents report, the treasurer report, and the awards report. The other members are allowed to comment and communicate about(predicate) the information being stated during these reports however they are not allowed to mention any new information. one time these reports take in been read and discussed, the other members of the group befool an chance to discuss issues or concerns they yield with any topic or how they choose a achiever for a certain award. Primary topics discussed in the meeting we re the previous months SITREPS (military or SNA news), approaching events, and membership issues. The members of the group subd information base on previous situations as related to on-going situations, and they give advice and criticisms for the previous months activities or lack there of activities. Members were open to information exchange and did not take any criticism in a negative manner. Communication was open so that all members could communicate with one another. All members had the opportunity to exchange comments or concerns about any of the topics covered.Psychologist Irving Janis coined the consideration groupthink, the term relates to the groups hope for contour and its decision make process. Groups that use groupthink are more concerned with the conformity of the group that the members may guide incorrect decisions in order to preserve the harmony. Janis had trio requirements he believed that groupthink would need in order to be developed. These requirements were that the group was cohesive, the group was isolated from dissenting views, and the group had a leader who signaled the decision they favored (Myers, 2010). Surface Navy Association did meet of these requirements, and I close felt bad that it took a school assignment in order to see what this group was sincerely about.While the group did seem to be in the main a united group, there were times of variation but they were settled quickly. This dissension was met in a positive way to attentionthe members learn and grow. The group did make decisions that benefited not only the group as a whole but benefited the members as individuals and the community. base on the definition of groupthink, SNA was vulnerable to it, but at the same time the group was concerned with making informed decisions than to keep harmony within the group. congruity is when changing or adopting behaviors or attitudes are logical with the social norms of a group (Wood, Wood, & Boyd, 2011). Surface Navy A ssociation has social norms, or standards of behavior pass judgment of its members. These norms include behavior while representing this organization and also any military unit they are with as well as behavior in planetary while out in town because members of this association for the around part are well cognise within the military. These standards include basic behaviors such as refraining from criminal activity and moral behaviors. While most members adhere to these standards in his or her everyday deportment in general, all members are expected to conform to the standards. There are punishments for the members who do not conform to these standards. These punishments include rejection of membership and even them reporting any behavior to their commands.The affect of a group may have a significant influence on an individual. However, studies have revealed that social interaction can heighten individual emotions (Barsade & Gibson, 2012). These social interactions can affect two the person and the group outcomes. Social facilitation is an important bore of the group experience. Social facilitation is the positive or negative effect on an individuals motion attributed to the presence of others (Wood, Wood, & Boyd, 2011). SNA group gives it members a sense of string and gives them a chance to give back to people still in the military and to also percent what they have been though to people that are thinking about joining the military and also to help give insight to what military personnel go though.The members within this group understand the importance of the tasks they moldiness perform in order to show what not bad(predicate) military personnel can do. Due to this understanding, the members piece of work together as a team quite an than as individuals. The member of this group are unite and appears to be as close as family, and members are together inthis group show their desire to help others in the military community.In the end groups are pa rt of everyones life no matter how much you try to avoid them somehow you once or are part of a group. Groups help to assist us in heterogeneous different tasks and situations throughout our lives. Groups have their own standards, rules, and organization, and can have a negative or positive impact on your life. The Surface Navy Association strives to have a positive impact on all people both members and citizens. This organization helps to lighten lives by providing an outlet for retire and active business military people to have people to talk of the town to that understand and also achievements they are recognized for. The members have learned to work together to achieve the goals of the group, and they have conformed to the standards set forth in order to substantiate membership and have become a corporate group because of the efforts of the members.ReferencesBarsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2012). Group affect Its influence on individual and group outcomes. Current Direct ions in psychological Science, 21(2), 119-123.Myers, D. (2010). Social Psychology (10th ed.). New York, NY McGraw Hill.Surface Navy Association (2014). SNA Website. Retrieved from http//www.navysna.org/default.htmWood, S. E., Wood, E. G., & Boyd, D. (2011). The world of psychology (7th ed.). Boston, MA Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.